The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008

The supplied graphs provide informations of graduated and postgraduates students in Britain who did not start full-time work after graduation in 2008. It is obvious from the illustration that majority of students continued with further study and worked part-time.

It is clear that graduated and postgraduate students have a similar count of students who continued study of 29665 and 2725 students respectively. Graduated students showed almost same average of part-time work and unemployment of 17735 and 16235 respectively. However only 3500 graduated students started working as a volunteers.

According to the data there is a huge gap between part-time workers and volunteers in a group of postgraduate students. It is apparently seen from the given graph that only 345 students became work as a volunteers, while 2535 postgraduate students worked as part-timers. 1625 students stayed unemployed.

To conclude, both groups of students graduated in UK in 2008 showed similar figures despite counts of students in graduated and postgraduates group.

Votes
Average: 5 (5 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a volunteer' or simply 'volunteers'?
Suggestion: a volunteer; volunteers
...0 graduated students started working as a volunteers. According to the data there is a h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 202, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a volunteer' or simply 'volunteers'?
Suggestion: a volunteer; volunteers
...h that only 345 students became work as a volunteers, while 2535 postgraduate students worke...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, however, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66666666667 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16667759643 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572327044025 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.7760267035 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.111111111 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.31 11.4140731707 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.