The table below gives information about student enrolment at Bristol University in 1928 1958 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The table below gives information about student enrolment at Bristol University in 1928, 1958, and 2008.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table compares about how many students were enrolled at Bristol University in 1928, 1958 and 2008.

Overall, it can be seen that the total number of students surged year on year significantly, whereas the proportion of local students and males dropped.

In terms of net number of registered students, there was a sharp swell from 1928 (218), rocketing to 6337 in the end of the term. In contrast, males with almost three-fifths (58%) in 1928 witnessed a sharp shrink to 46% in 2008. While local students accounted exactly a half (50%), females stood at just over two-fifths (42%) in 1928. However, in the final term (2008), there was a considerable swell to 54% (females), the local students hit a trough of 1-2%, which was the least net.

Turning to overseas students, despite reaching close to a third (28%) in 2008, they remained at fairly lower totals at 5% and 6% in 1928 and 1958 respectively, as compared to others.

Votes
Average: 5 (22 votes)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, third, well, whereas, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 762.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7625 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62246901793 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64375 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 203.4 283.868780488 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.2574776767 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.857142857 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215405947541 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108188102492 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112615116501 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158421749677 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127940065463 0.0819641961636 156% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 7 10
No. of Words: 160 200
No. of Characters: 720 1000
No. of Different Words: 98 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.557 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.5 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.579 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 44 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 35 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 25 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 11 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.857 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.514 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.714 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.474 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.758 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.101 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4