The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.
The table provided the statics of subway systems in six cities about the start date, route's length and annual passengers.
Overall, the underground railway systems of los angeles was by far the newest in 2001 while london's subway ground was the oldest since 19th century. Moreover, the railway systems of Paris, tokyo, washington dc and kyoto was opened in a similar century.
However, london comprised the longest router which accounted for 394 kilometers. It was followed by Paris's and tokyo's routers which recorded for 199 km and 155 km respectively. In contrast, The shortest router was settled in kyoto approximately 11 kilometres.
On the other hand, the number of subway passengers topped the statics with 1927 million users as nearly two times as Paris's passengers. In comparison, los angeles and kyoto had a resemblance on quantity of people who use this transport which was 45 and 50 millions respectively. In addition, washington dc's underground railway systems had nearly threefold of passengers as two above-mentioned cities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 253, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... kyoto was opened in a similar century. However, london comprised the longest ro...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, so, while, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 879.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32727272727 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91825576545 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612121212121 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.8999974172 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.6666666667 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174765517666 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701870662903 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0848852583203 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110326319645 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0748870411442 0.0819641961636 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.