The table below gives information on visitor statistics for 1996 1998 and 2000 for various World Heritage sites in Australia

Essay topics:

The table below gives information on visitor statistics for 1996, 1998 and 2000 for various World Heritage sites in Australia

The table compares the number of people went to different World Heritage places in Australia between 1996 and 2000.
Generally, the total number of visitors to those places showed an upward trend, excepting Central Eastern Rainforest Reserve and Macquarie Island. Besides, the Great Barrier Reef was the most popular in all of the location and the opposite was true for Macquarie Island.
In 1996, 1,670,000 tourists paid a visit to the Great Barrier Reef, three times higher as the Blue Mountains and four times as the Tasmania Wilderness. Over the two years ensuing, there was a dramatic increase of almost twice as many visitors to the Great Barrier Reef, followed by another slight rise about 200,000 people in 2000. The number of travellers in both the Blue Mountains and the Tasmania Wilderness also experienced a mild growth to 581,000 and 483,000 at the last year, respectively.
Regarding the other destinations, the Central Eastern Rainforest Reserve ranked second in terms of popularity, that picked about 800,000 tourists in 1996, while the figure for Macquarie Island only had 350 visiting. After 4 years, the amount of people entered both sites above decreased mildly to 770,000 and 330 respectively. The remaining place, 84,000 travellers chose to visit Shark Bay in 1996, two years later the figure went up 102,000 persons before falling down 89,000 individuals at the end of the period.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (4 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 204, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...at Barrier Reef was the most popular in all of the location and the opposite was true for ...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, regarding, second, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1181.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1798245614 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55485750299 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59649122807 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.516165254 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.222222222 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133395771357 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610963321924 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069313687371 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104982327258 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0828435028218 0.0819641961636 101% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 204, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...at Barrier Reef was the most popular in all of the location and the opposite was true for ...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, regarding, second, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1181.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1798245614 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55485750299 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59649122807 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.516165254 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.222222222 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133395771357 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610963321924 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069313687371 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104982327258 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0828435028218 0.0819641961636 101% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.