The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.
The provided charts represent the total number of visitors, who visited to Ashdown Museum and an overview of the satisfaction ratio of the people for after and before refurbishment of the museum.
Overall, the higher number of people visited to the museum after refurbishment compared to before refurbishment. In addition, a significant number of people were “very dissatisfied” before refurbishment; whereas, it was ”satisfied” after refurbishment.
Total 74,000 people visited at the Ashdown museum during the year before refurbishment. At that time, the greatest number of people were “dissatisfied“ and it was 40 people, while, 30 people were “satisfied”. Moreover, the number of people, who were ”very satisfied” and “very dissatisfied“ was 15 and 10 people respectively. Only 5 people were not responded in the survey.
On the other hand, 92,000 people visited to the museum during the year after refurbishment. At the same time, the highest number of people were “satisfied“ and it was 40; in contrast, 15 people were “dissatisfied”. The number of ”very satisfied” people were 35.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, whereas, while, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1014.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.96470588235 4.92477711251 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.48505785299 2.65546596893 169% => OK
Unique words: 73.0 106.607317073 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.429411764706 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.45097560976 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.2521185934 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.4 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.3 5.23603664747 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189106850278 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123730945952 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577024730957 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153538504982 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0113835164278 0.0819641961636 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 61.2550243902 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.99 11.4140731707 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.