The table below shows the results of a 20-year study into why adults in the UK attend arts events.
The table demonstrates the result of the survey which explains the motives of visiting art presentations. The data are available for the present moment and for ten and twenty years ago periods.
As an overall trend, it might be clearly seen that the main point of exploring an art event, which is a wish to see a specific performer or artist, stayed the same over the twenty-year period of study. Aside from this, in recent years more and more people tend to visit the arts accompanying by kids or regarding their work or business duties.
According to the table, the percentage of people who are involved in any celebration in, for instance, an art gallery has decreased dramatically over the twenty-year period from 27 per cent to only 9 per cent. As for people visiting art events with children or colleagues, these numbers have increased by 13 per cent and 5 per cent and have reached their highest numbers of 24 per cent and 11 per cent respectively.
Interestingly, the group desired to attend unique arrangements has fluctuated over the years from 58 per cent twenty years ago to 55 in ten years having reached eventually 56 per cent mark.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, as for, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 953.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.765 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74801746719 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.2405913319 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.142857143 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5714285714 22.9334400587 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117698642344 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678105746759 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398631242873 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0867344448475 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326547751095 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.