The tables below give information about sales of fairtrade

Essay topics:

The tables below give information about sales of fairtrade

The tables compare the amounts of money five countries in Europe spent on Fairtrade-labelled coffee and banana in 1999 and 2004.

According to the table, the sales of coffee in Denmark and Sweden both saw an increase of 0.2 millions of euros. Residents in Belgium were also spending more money on this product. Furthermore, Switzerland's figure of 2004 doubled that of 1999, while a tremendous rise could be seen in the UK expenditure on coffee, which made it the country whose budget was biggest for coffee.

On the other hand, the figures for Switzerland, UK and Belgium's spending on bananas also experienced the same pattern. To be more specific, the increases in these countries were nearly threefold, fivefold and eightfold respectively. In contrast, the sales of banana in Sweden decreased by 0.8 millions of euros and that of Denmark saw a fall of 1.1 millions of euros in 2004.

All in all, through the years, coffee seemed to have maintained its share of the market, while bananas became less common of a product to residents in Denmark and Belgium.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '2 million'.
Suggestion: 2 million
...rk and Sweden both saw an increase of 0.2 millions of euros. Residents in Belgium were also s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 292, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '8 million'.
Suggestion: 8 million
...ales of banana in Sweden decreased by 0.8 millions of euros and that of Denmark saw a fall of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 348, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '1 million'.
Suggestion: 1 million
...ros and that of Denmark saw a fall of 1.1 millions of euros in 2004. All in all, through t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, while, in contrast, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 888.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96089385475 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81554269576 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586592178771 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9203111444 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0603455496911 0.215688989381 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.027728497368 0.103423049105 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399400314803 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0434151149134 0.15604864568 28% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427660111699 0.0819641961636 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.