Some people believe that academic subjects such as chemistry, physics and history should be taught in schools, while others believe that students will derive more benefit from studying practical subjects, such as motor mechanics and cooking.
Discuss both views and give you own opinion.
People have different views about what should be included in the educational curriculum. While some think that practical subjects provide more advantages to students, I would argue that both practical and academic subjects are equally beneficial.
On the one hand, it is believed that learners gain more benefits when studying practical subjects. Firstly, as students are exposed to a number of pragmatic skills, they would be better prepared for their future careers. For example, if children are taught how simple machines work at school, they are more likely to become competent mechanics later....
Subscribe as testbig VIP readers and get unlimited access to essays on the top list.
Sentence: Another reason is that in order to be admitted to pretigious universities or colleges, learners must have adequate academic performances.
Error: pretigious Suggestion: prestigious
Sentence: Thet cannot attend their dream universities if they place a great emphasis on pratical subjects.
Error: pratical Suggestion: practical
flaws:
Sentence Length SD: 4.772 7.5 //"Sentence Length SD is low" means that the essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentences varieties wanted.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 276 350
No. of Characters: 1458 1500
No. of Different Words: 168 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.076 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.283 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.768 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 115 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 95 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 73 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 35 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.714 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.772 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.643 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.334 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.526 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.039 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5