The 18th century due to industrialization a lot of people migrate to developed countries. This affected lifestyle and increased major problems in developed countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Recently, the phenomenon of migration to developed countires in 18th century and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that this social incident and its problem for developed countries is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that looking at the effects of this major migration on people's lifestyle can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughly in this essay.

From the social standpoint, moving to a better place can provide he society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that increasing urban areas, as well as technological advancements, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered higher rates of crime and violation in England during 18th century. Thus, beneficial amifications of both expansion of cities and social problems apparently can be seen.

Within the realm of culture, migrating from an undeveloped country to a new place might increase the consequences of culltural shock. Moreover, fundamental aspects of proposing a proper solution for such issues relate to this reality that the demerits of entering a new country pertain to dramatic changes in lifestyle. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of overcoming the problems.

To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of inspecting root cuases do to migration far outweigh its drawbacks.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 437, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
... the effects of this major migration on peoples lifestyle can be a plus, and I will ana...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 352, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...festyle. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of overcoming th...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, hence, if, look, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45059288538 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10862466593 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.656126482213 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.1075381727 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.9 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169170753942 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586400150541 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523909699432 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0877527679434 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774423333811 0.056905535591 136% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.06 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.