Since the arrival of industrialization and excessive consumerism, environmental issue has been a major concern over the recent years. It is often argued that raising the price of fuel is the optimal mean to resolve the environmental problem. In my view, I partially agree with the given statement and I believe that there are other ways that are also useful to manage the problem.
It is undeniable that the primary reason of the air pollution is rooted in the fuel utilization. During the process of burning the fuel, massive amount of contaminated gas would be generated. Take fossil fuel for example, the research indicates that most of the air pollution is produced by the transportation, particularly the automobile. To grapple with this critical issue, increasing the price of the petroleum is necessary. In this way, it could not only reduce the emission of harmful gas, but also relieve the heavy congestion of traffic.
Even though raising the price of the fuel is an idea measure to deal with serious environmental issue, there are still other ways which is essential as well. It is vitally important for the government to impose the tax on the meat as it would produce substantial quantity of carbon dioxide which is the source of global warming. To demonstrate, the scientific researchers suggest that most of the carbon emissions are attributed to the farming of the cows and pigs. Accordingly, taxing on the meat may effective to alleviate the global warming as a result of the carbon dioxide.
By way of conclusion, as argued above, I firmly believe that increasing the price of fuel and taxing the meat are both pivotal to tackle the environmental issue. For the betterment of the environment, both of which should be strictly implemented.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, if, may, so, still, well, for example, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03071672355 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97252186963 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529010238908 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.5166925219 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.285714286 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245689469003 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079845302643 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719150395658 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148393869909 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526422478765 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.