The charts below show reasons for travel and the main issues for the travelling public in the US in 2009.
The charts illustrate the causes for travelling and the chief problems for those who travel in the US in 2009.
In broad, it is clear that there was a marked difference between work-related travel and other causes of travel. A similar relation could be observed for price of travel, as far as factors troubling travelers are concerned.
Firstly, the bar chart indicates that commuting to and from work was the prime motivation for travelling, as stated by nearly a half of the travelers. At significantly smaller figures, slightly under one fifth of the people travelled for personal reasons and 16% for the purpose of shopping. Only one out of every ten travelers went out for social reasons or for recreation whereas visiting friends and relatives was the least significant cause of travelling (at only 6%).
Turning to the main issues for the travelling public, it is remarkable that price of travel was the main issue, constituting more than a third. This is followed by safety concerns, aggressive driver and highway congestion with figures ranging from 19% to 14%. By contrast, very small proportions of travelers were troubled by pedestrian space (6%) and access to public transport (5%)
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tors troubling travelers are concerned. Firstly, the bar chart indicates that co...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, so, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1010.0 1615.20841683 63% => OK
No of words: 197.0 315.596192385 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1269035533 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 4.20363070211 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79404622787 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 176.041082164 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.644670050761 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 506.74238477 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.2049933212 49.4020404114 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 112.222222222 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.526673006076 0.244688304435 215% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.219670352156 0.084324248473 261% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13981350634 0.0667982634062 209% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.336288328048 0.151304729494 222% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0866246355589 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.