As countries develop, more and more people buy and use their own cars. Do the advantages of this trend for individuals outweigh the disadvantages for the environment?
The critical advancement of technology has a favorable impact on people’s lives, and one such instance is the universality of private transportations. Despite its convenience, individuals believe that the damage to the natural environment created by this phenomenon is unacceptable, of which I second.
The intention of using cars is upstanding: to have the most convenience. Indeed, driving by cars would give one’s independence from the constraint of time and location. When using public transports, it is obligatory to be punctual and well-prepared, as these will only stop by once in a while. Furthermore, some countries do not provide sufficient public transports, especially when it is overcrowded, which leads to the late arrival for many individuals. Recent survey informed that 20% of the people were late when using buses due to the lack of public transportations. However, it is not as alarming as the harm done on natural environment.
To begin with, many private transportations are the cause of air pollution. If by using buses limits the smoke injecting the environment, cars would multiply this by the number of people on that bus. This is severe torture for individual’s lives and environmental balance. In fact, humans are putting themselves at risk of pneumonia, cough, lung cancer, which is only a minor reflection of this pollution. Moreover, more vehicles require more supplies of energy, imposing fuels to run out. Keep in mind that this natural resource is limited, which is irreversible once it is used up. Consequently, the excessive growth of cars has aggressively endangered the natural environment, thus creating a negative impact on humans lives.
To recapitulate, while acknowledging the significance of private transportation, it cannot outweigh the unfavorable influence on people’s lives. Actions are required to minimize and put a stop to this catastrophe.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, thus, well, while, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1626.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51186440678 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.47265593895 2.80592935109 124% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586440677966 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4576913859 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6470588235 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3529411765 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05882352941 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197249574358 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549800431311 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469613703677 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10516590682 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359983175278 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.