Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

In my opinion, I agree that governments should consider to provide money on developing railways rather than roads. Despite, I also believe that building a better roads is important too.

Nowadays, the government is trying to improve citizen's quality of life by providing convenient factors such as health care, communication and transportation. However, railway is one of the underrated transportation in Thailand. Because most people only use the skytrain or subway as priority, which is the reason why railways is not getting much attention.

Developing railways can solve traffic congestion and also can improve Thailand's economic systems, as massive population growth and higher demands, it will completely make a different to our country. For example, if there are more lines and stations for the railways itself, travelers and foreigners can have an alternative ways to travel around the country. The more railways accessed the more business started up.

Moreover, not only creating more lines but also need to improve the quality of the trains. To installing an air-conditions and replacing a better seats, which makes an equality to all passengers, making it more comfortable and satisfied experiences.

On the other hand, as I mentioned before that to building a better roads is also right thing to do. Most of people in Thailand still using a car as their main transportation. Not only car but also a bus, taxi meters and motorcycles, those needed to be on a road. So building a better roads can reduce a chance of the accidents, which caused by a bad construction, because it helps drivers to be safer and can drives easily.

In conclusion, the government needs to manage some money to developing the railways and spend some of the rest on building a better roads to improve citizen's quality of life and our country's better economy.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'consider providing'.
Suggestion: consider providing
...pinion, I agree that governments should consider to provide money on developing railways rather tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 324, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'way'?
Suggestion: way
... and foreigners can have an alternative ways to travel around the country. The more ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 81, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that to building a better roads is also right thing to do. Most of people in Tha...
^^
Line 9, column 102, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Most of', you should use 'the' ('Most of the people') or simply say ''Most people''.
Suggestion: Most of the people; Most people
...etter roads is also right thing to do. Most of people in Thailand still using a car as their ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 185, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r as their main transportation. Not only car but also a bus, taxi meters and moto...
^^
Line 9, column 412, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'drive'
Suggestion: drive
...se it helps drivers to be safer and can drives easily. In conclusion, the governmen...
^^^^^^
Line 11, column 95, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ey to developing the railways and spend some of the rest on building a better roads to impr...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'still', 'for example', 'in conclusion', 'such as', 'in my opinion', 'on the other hand']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.241071428571 0.247107183377 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.151785714286 0.155533422707 98% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0833333333333 0.0946595960268 88% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0625 0.0501214627716 125% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0327380952381 0.0437548338989 75% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0982142857143 0.122226691241 80% => OK
Participles: 0.0505952380952 0.0403226058552 125% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.95920725732 2.80594681477 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0416666666667 0.0326793684256 128% => OK
Particles: 0.00297619047619 0.00163938923432 182% => OK
Determiners: 0.10119047619 0.0861772015684 117% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0208333333333 0.021408717616 97% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0119047619048 0.011925033212 100% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1855.0 1933.35771543 96% => OK
No of words: 302.0 316.048096192 96% => OK
Chars per words: 6.14238410596 6.12580529183 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20517956788 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.397350993377 0.374742101984 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.301324503311 0.28420135186 106% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.23178807947 0.203846283523 114% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.129139072848 0.137316102897 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95920725732 2.80594681477 105% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.037074148 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556291390728 0.56093040696 99% => OK
Word variations: 58.4114814489 60.7387585426 96% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0891783567 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.1333333333 20.7743622355 97% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9247151178 49.517814964 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.666666667 127.492653851 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1333333333 20.7743622355 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8 0.814263465372 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38877755511 137% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 3.99599198397 175% => OK
Readability: 50.2657836645 49.1944974215 102% => OK
Elegance: 1.57831325301 1.69124875643 93% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155529552078 0.332605444948 47% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.109788725165 0.102741220458 107% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0579707280364 0.0668466124924 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.602735260439 0.534860350844 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.154170729716 0.148594505496 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637731942231 0.134430193775 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598947506527 0.0742795772207 81% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.229280610917 0.324371583561 71% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0920332859162 0.0638462369009 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101114458978 0.228012699653 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470371811795 0.058150111329 81% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.68436873747 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.41683366733 176% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 5.90881763527 135% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 2.5751503006 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 5.0 1.9629258517 255% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.4468937876 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.