It's generally believed that some people are born with certains talents, for instance for sport or music, and others are not, However, it;s claimed that any child can be taught to be a good sports person or a musician.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is now and then a common belief that some people are born with faculty in certain fields such as sport or music while others are not. On the other hand, people also think that it is in fact possible for everyone to master anything through training. By the same token, the question of whether a child can be taught to become an athletic or musician remains one of the most hotly-debated topics among generations. In this essay, the reasons for these two differents views will be pointed out.
The world is consistently developing referring to new science techniques. However, but for the science's capacity of faciliating people's life, it is still widely believed that human's innate mind can not be entirely changed by any outer effects. Being inbornly sporty or able to touch high notes are considered congenital ''talents'' that not everyone can attain through learning. There are indeed requisite factors when it comes to these terms. An evident example for this is that to sing well, people have to originally be endowed with a good singing voice and additionally the ability to feel the music properly be sensitive to music. Another eloquent testimon to this idea is probably the individual difference of body shapes and health conditions.
In contrast to the given idea, a group of people remain belief in the possibility of being talented through theoretical and practical learning. According to them, human are born with immaculate brain and gain knowledge through experiences. Their surroundings could therefore have a great impact on their perception. I am side with this opinions as I myself am not genetically physically strong but as a result of incessant efforts, I manage to do well execute well enough to pass every sport tests with high evaluations of the teachers.
In conclusion, there are a great deal of arguments from both side of the views and none of the two sides is totally right or wrong. As far as I am concerned, there are chances for everyone to succeed in any subjects including sport or music if they work hard enough for their wills.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 272, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...ng through training. By the same token, the question of whether a child can be taught to become an athl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sciences'' or 'science's'?
Suggestion: sciences'; science's
...cience techniques. However, but for the sciences capacity of faciliating peoples life, i...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...act on their perception. I am side with this opinions as I myself am not genetically...
^^^^
Line 7, column 34, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'deals'?
Suggestion: deals
...s. In conclusion, there are a great deal of arguments from both side of the view...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, then, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, such as, as a result, in contrast to, by the same token, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90598290598 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67372504389 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598290598291 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2770417629 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.625 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9375 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367385117375 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0944742395469 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701278737844 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204171891609 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0832122075214 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.