It is said that only wealthy nations take liability for global environmental problems. From my perspective, I disagree with this statement since we all live on the same planet and then have to mutually deal with this issues.
There are several compelling reasons why wealthy countries should account for this issues. Firstly, since these nations were the first ones to industrialize, this could bring about some adverse impacts in our ecosystem. By cooperating some manufacturing factories, this process of industrialization released a sheer volume of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere leading to air pollutions. Secondly, throughout exploiting the natural resources, it allowed these countries to become richer and more developed. Therefore, they should lead the way in substantially contributing to the environmental protection with their considerable ability and advanced technologies.
On the other hand, while numerous countries with their wealth are trying to cope with this issues, it will not matter if the developing countries are still harming our green shelter. As developing countries mean getting more economically developed these days than rich nations doing in the past and the majority of world’s population live in there, the pollution level could remarkably increase as well. Moreover, there is an alarming lack of public awareness towards environmental preservation in some poor nations throughout deforestation and overexploitation for their economic activities, thereby leading to some negative effect on the natural world. It will be meaningless if the most developed countries take action while China, for example, the world’s biggest polluter with over one billion people living in, does not.
To conclude, the major environmental problems stem from human activities. Therefore, every single country in the world should give a hand to alleviate this problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...net and then have to mutually deal with this issues. There are several compelling ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 80, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...hy wealthy countries should account for this issues. Firstly, since these nations we...
^^^^
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...th their wealth are trying to cope with this issues, it will not matter if the devel...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, well, while, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71631205674 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10508125516 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648936170213 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2538184103 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53846153846 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21836810959 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727972500039 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425803433762 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132427358374 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500029487955 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.