Nowadays the importance of teachers is diminishing due to increased availability of alternative resources to students To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and support with relevant examples

Essay topics:

Nowadays the importance of teachers is diminishing due to increased availability of alternative resources to students. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement ? Give reasons for your answer and support with relevant examples.

Education is the key to open the lock of success. Gone are the days when the trend of attaining education from teachers was quite prevalent all over the world. At present, the widespread availability of alternative learning sources is curtailing the significance of tutors at an alarming rate. This essay intends to disagree with the given statement entirely and some logical points will be discussed in upcoming paragraphs.

There are manifold points to endorse my point of view. First and foremost, teaching skills of teachers make them matchless and their importance can never be faded by the alternative sources. To demonstrate, unlike technology, teachers can modify their methods of teaching according to the strength and abilities of students. This makes it possible for every pupil to understand the guideline conferred by teachers. What is more, an effective learning not only requires supreme guidance but also need inspiration, emotional support and a healthy learning environment that can only be provided by the teachers. Consequently, the role of a teacher in terms of learning is beyond compare.

Further emphasising on my point of view, in this modern context, teachers are believed to be impeccable for making all around development of students. To illustrate, computers and projectors can provide education but they can neither prevent students from bad habits such as indiscipline, bunking class nor arouse them for co-curricular activities. On the other hand, teachers are well known for making students disciplined, punctual and making them good at sports and extra curricular activities. Needless to say, taking the place of teacher will remain a dream for technology forever. The presence of teachers also makes students realize their goals and helps them bring out their maximum inner potential. The urgency of teacher for the bright future of students is thus very clear and no any other alternative can become their replacement.

To recapitulate, undeniably, technical resources are attracting the attention of people towards learning with audio video aids. However, the impact of teacher will always be a trademark and no any other replacement will work out.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (5 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...e key to open the lock of success. Gone are the days when the trend of attaining ed...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...erms of learning is beyond compare. Further emphasising on my point of view, in thi...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 191, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... teacher will always be a trademark and no any other replacement will work out. ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, so, thus, well, such as, on the contrary, what is more, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2198.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 408.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38725490196 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9191166181 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575980392157 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 685.8 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4158796711 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9090909091 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5454545455 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181765403258 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497579791641 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341225242285 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0982035504964 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.016834984853 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 342 350
No. of Characters: 1806 1500
No. of Different Words: 202 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.3 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.281 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.81 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 139 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 116 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 88 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 52 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.312 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.444 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.286 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.487 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.081 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5