It is undeniable fact, conclusively, that technology has been thiriving of human communication. In this modern era, the following trend of far distance communication has take position of face to face interaction which people preferable to choose easily way to connect with loved one. Facebook, twitter and other absolutely beneficial rather than other, albeit several drawbacks follow before it.
Interconnection among persons has whereby been evolved with regard to the profoundly growth of technology which is social media. This phenomenon surely brings numerous virtues. First and foremost is, considerably, social networking websites attract people to develop social, personal, and even commercial bonding. To illustrate, nowadays, it is easily to find people chatting via facebook in order to create overseas relation among student, teacher, even high-class people. Such sites are also associted with valuable information which achievment, prestige, and famous one including education when people use it in the right perspective. In additon, it also is commonly used to deal with enterprises or company by means generating letter agreement. Moreover, for demostrate, student who study far away from his parent take a social networking as a solution to be near with family.
Nevertheless, several demerits also follow this issue. People could sink into the deep of virtuallity that surreal as well. Mostly, presently, folks scarcely spend a great deal time to play social media without consider family time with their family. As a consequnce, sometime social media could bring unwanted situation that may lead to fragmentation of family even divorce. Futhermore, labeling to people who less social interaction will succumb a distress. Less of excersises because of spending time on computer as well as causes of fatal ailiments --- backpain, osteporosis and other major disorder.
To conclude, undeniably, networking by websites probably has disadvatages, hence numerous merits outweigh its uncontrollable of drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 253, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...which people preferable to choose easily way to connect with loved one. Facebook,...
^^
Line 5, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...irtuallity that surreal as well. Mostly, presently, folks scarcely spend a great ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, as well as, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1734.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01680155122 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673333333333 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4919599224 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6470588235 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164385142165 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0438029039971 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0306146045199 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0850500597017 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381865784031 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.16 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.