Online shopping is increasing dramatically. How could this trend affect our environment and the kinds of jobs required?
With the advent of the internet and technological advances, online shopping has been becoming more and more prevalent in both affluent and low-income developing countries. However, this tendency might bring about both pros and cons to the environment and jobs, which will be examined in this essay.
Concerning the environment, it is plausible that e-shopping could result in carbon dioxide emissions reduction but increasing the use of plastic bags. On the one hand, door-to-door delivery stemming from online shopping is likely to facilitate consumers to steer clear of heading for supermarket, which, in turn, attributes to the plummeting number of car trips. As a result, carbon dioxide emissions from private cars for those trips tend to be reduced significantly, contributing to alleviating air pollution. On the other hand, online shopping might deteriorate the use of plastic bags. This is because supermarkets are necessary to take advantage of plastic bags to pack products prior to delivery. Consequently, plastic bags might gradually exacerbate soil pollution if these plastic bags are dumped in landfill sites.
In tandem with this, online shopping also brings about both advantages and disadvantages to jobs. Regarding the plus point, what e-shopping might benefit is to provide job seekers with a plethora of vacancies. IT employers, for instance, are inclined to devise an array of brand-new web-based shopping platforms or applications to meet the soaring requirements of customers, which might open up job opportunities for IT workers. Nonetheless, the breakthroughs in online shopping might lead to the soaring unemployment rate in retail shop owners. To be more specific, what retail shops fail to cater for customers is the lack of fast delivery service along with the shortage of necessary products, which might hinder consumers from goods purchase. Thus, it is mighty that retail shop owners could face the loss of their business.
In conclusion, the transformation of the internet and technology has promoted the boom of online shopping in every corner of the world. However, this trend might have both positive and negative impacts on the environment and jobs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-21 | Mirajanecute | 67 | view |
| 2022-11-24 | phuongphuongt1234 | 61 | view |
| 2022-10-23 | 17142052@student.hcmute.edu.vn | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-25 | tamle | 84 | view |
| 2021-07-25 | tamle | 78 | view |
- In many countries the government spends a large amount money on the arts Some people agree with this However others think the government should spend more on healthcare and education Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your 78
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 85
- Employers should give their staff at least a 4 week holiday a year to help employees perform better in their jobs To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 73
- All education and healthcare should be funded by the government and free for everyone To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- The only solution to improve safety on roads is to stricter punishment for driving offences To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, nonetheless, regarding, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1855.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45588235294 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98764902771 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564705882353 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1233242428 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.9375 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1875 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226273449016 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783996624982 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425548363593 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140221481308 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316078464271 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.