It is widely said that international sporting competitions such as Olympic sport games play an immense rule in relieving global problems and also contribute to patriotic actions in secure way in this era. To me, this idea seems appealing. Not only would it readily result in closeness of the nations, but it would also lead to honors for countries.
On the one hand, it is generally debated that international sporting events are viable means to make states more close to each other. Nowadays, there are some political issues that have detrimental effects on the nations relationships. Although creating of the some obstacles somehow hinder development of the peace between countries, their athletes compete with each other with a sense of fair play in sport matches. For example, in 1998 X football international team was present in the football world cup and had competition with countries like W and V. Though these countries formerly had some political disagreements, these sport competitions had vitally positive effects in smoothing their conflicts subsequently.
On the other hand, when it comes to bringing honors and proud moments for nations, the sport festivals like football world cup is the best places. Athletes would intensively unify their effort to show their ability distinctively and by conquering medals would make the name of their homelands well-known. For example, there are a large number of small and nameless countries that by being victorious in international competitions annually illustrate the flag and name of their countries to the inhabitant of this planet.
To sum up, in my personal view, it would be wise if heads of the states pay more attention to holding international sporting events regularly. Not only would it lead to boos to the relationships amongst nations, but it would result in making people acquaintance with different countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...relationships. Although creating of the some obstacles somehow hinder development of...
^^^^
Line 5, column 329, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ands well-known. For example, there are a large number of small and nameless countries that by be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, for example, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95081156445 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556666666667 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7577304817 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.230769231 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76923076923 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207297443959 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738186543279 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643639227914 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121152763122 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347807401766 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.