Some people believe that international sporting events are the ideal opportunity to show the world the qualities of the hosting nation. Others believe that these events are mainly a large unjustifiable expense.
To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Over the past few decades, the enthusiasm for governments to host significant sports events has surged dramatically. Many commentators argue that it is an ideal opportunity to demonstrate their cultural heritage and economic power during the events, while others think governments should spend the budget on other industries. In this essay, I shall examine both of the above views can hold water according to the different situation of countries.
To begin with, it is not a waste of money for rich countries like the USA, Britain and Australia, to show their national qualities by holding big sporting events. Due to the high level of development in these countries, governments possess a huge amount of money on events, like the Olympics, without seriously diminishing their national income. In addition, local residents can also benefit from the facilities, stadiums and sportsground because normally those places are open to everyone after events. Since the costs for events are affordable and the coming result is positive, the government of rich countries are willing to host big sporting ceremonies.
On the other hand, it is actually a large financial burden for some developing countries to host a fantastic sporting event. This is because there are more areas, such as education, food safety, infrastructure, etc., need money from the government in these countries. Governments should put priority in improving the living qualities of people when they make the national budget. The tax income is from people and should be spent for people. It is therefore clear that governments of poor countries would use their money more carefully and try not to waste on expensive events hosting.
In conclusion, every country has a different condition and the government should take into considerations when they make a decision.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, if, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36551724138 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90070515024 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589655172414 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7995103006 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.692307692 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164692258071 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618183457511 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552589049619 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0913463947577 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056525868658 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.