Some people believe that to protect local culture tourism should be banned in some areas whereas others think that change is inevitable and banning tourism will have no benefits Discuss both sides and give your opinion

For the last few decades, many nations have witnessed an overwhelming increase in the number of tourists. While some people argue that prohibiting strangers in well known places remains an appropriate way of safeguarding territorial culture, in my opinion, the correction appears inexorable and restricting journeyers becomes seriously detrimental to a nation and society. This essay will support my opinion with relevant examples.

On the one hand, the economic growth of the country may receive a significant blow when the voyagers are denied entries. As it is clear that tourism accounts a marke...

*** The full content of this essay is available to VIP readers

Subscribe as testbig VIP readers and get unlimited access to essays on the top list.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (10 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 395, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are often
...s a consequence, drunken teenagers that often are responsible for vandalism and street cr...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53205128205 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99892458261 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.679487179487 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8513458524 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.875 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0625 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151082808754 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0413355254538 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506122478487 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.070830450515 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412694049263 0.056905535591 73% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.01 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

drunken teenagers that often are responsible
drunken teenagers who often are responsible

flaws:
Better to put the side you support at the third paragraph. and the start the third paragraph like this:

On the other hand, I would like to support this idea....

See how this user did:
http://www.testbig.com/users/mabick1527

this will be more smoothly.

---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 312 350
No. of Characters: 1673 1500
No. of Different Words: 208 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.203 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.362 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.896 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 137 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 116 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 78 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 50 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.399 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.438 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.275 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.485 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.027 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5