Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is believed that reading books is more beneficial for children than watching TV or playing games on the screen. In my opinion, I completely agree with this view for some reasons.
There are several positive reasons to explain the advantages of books. First of all, a regular habit of reading stories stimulates the imagination. By spending time on books, young people use their creativity to visualize characters and the scenery. Furthermore, teenagers can learn a lot of meaningful knowledge from reading. For example, a lesson from Cinderella - a very famous fairy tale teaches children never to stop believing in their dreams and themselves. Finally, reading requires more attention from children than watching TV or using computers. Reading books need to understand the content, therefore encourage children to research and foster their curiosity.
In contrast, I would reckon that spending excessive time playing games and television leads to serious problems. Firstly, children are likely to build sedentary life. Wasting too much time entertaining on the screen is harmful to health such as obesity, heart-attacked and diseases related to their eyes. Secondly, young people can easily be addicted to games leading to a lack of interaction. Youngsters are prone to exploit their time to sit in front of a screen rather than joining extracurricular activities like playing football, running and swimming,... which makes them lose contact and communication skills with their friends and other people.
In conclusion, for the reasons I have mentioned above, I strongly believe that reading stories from books is better than watching TV or playing games.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 355, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'game'.
Suggestion: game
... young people can easily be addicted to games leading to a lack of interaction. Young...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 556, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...e playing football, running and swimming,... which makes them lose contact and com...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41698841699 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89084199769 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625482625483 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2429367018 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.6875 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1875 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375465349642 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110939345 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125810731235 0.0667982634062 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.272346506475 0.151304729494 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127020516868 0.056905535591 223% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.