Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think law are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
In recent years, some environmentalists have claimed that there is a lack of domestic waste being recycled all around the world. In order to solve this pattern, although some believe that the only solution is to make recycling legal, the adverse effects of this method should be thoroughly considered.
First and foremost, recycling trash at home acts as a deterrent for trash-collecting process due to its inconvenience. First, it is impossible to manage the total amount of waste as well as the recycled one in each family, which might lead to a waste of time and money of the governments. For example, if one family has a birthday party or a well-fare party in March, their consumption in this month will surpass itself in April, therefore, the law can not be applied accurately through time. Second, since busy household consumers usually wait until the deadline to recycle their waste, a large amount of trash will be gathered at once in rush hours. In this case, both the governments and households suffer from tax losses.
Moreover, recycling have been proved one of the most expensive and unhealthy methods. First, it takes national time, labor and money to bring in and take new law for recycling waste into practice. In reality, it is more economical for governments to collect categorized trash and recycle it in assembly lines. Finally, recycling requires high-technology machines, otherwise, it will cause harm to human health. For instance, as some kinds of products such as nylon bags and plastic plates can be used only once, they will bring illnesses to households if the households try to reuse them for many times.
In conclusion, putting recycling into law practice is not an effective measure to convey citizens due to its inconvenient, expensive and unhealthy approaches. This decision should be replaced to avoid either domestic or national damages.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0974025974 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8821148955 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594155844156 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1299582955 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.142857143 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250025658139 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0830003419417 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043346322279 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14467899125 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585893688339 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.