Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
As if a large scale recycling was not enough of a problem on its own, it turns out that now governments have to deal with it at household level. In this essay, implementing laws to augment recycling is advocated despite a tiny flaw.
Putting these laws to action would be a tough push. People just throw away all of their recyclable materials since it is easier for them to do so. Survey of 1000 households in England shows that a considerable number of people (about 60% of the participants) still vacillate or find it laborious to recycle despite environmental benefits.
However, mandatory recycling protects the environment in a fantastically balanced approach. As trees are relentlessly cut down and destroyed, the recycled paper produced from trees is being utilized continuously, minimizing deforestation and felling. With the recycled paper being a good example, other natural resources are also reusable in this very way.
Furthermore, more recyclable materials are produced as a result of these laws, thus workers are required to collect and process them. This means that job opportunities are created within a community or those having part-time jobs get expanded to full-time positions. In return, the entire economy benefits from this. For example, in Iran there are many scavengers who make a living by searching through refuse and garbage bins to find recyclable objects such as bottles and cans.
On the whole, I aver that laws are required to add to the extent at which waste from our houses is recycled. After all, encouraging and developing the act of recycling is just like protecting ourselves and our beloved planet
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, still, thus, after all, for example, such as, as a result, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14925373134 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91153825724 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660447761194 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0836361185 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5714285714 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260329965243 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764312173729 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044036667843 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127070277928 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255644465359 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.