Some people say that too much attention and too much many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree about this opinion?
Over the past few decades, many researchers have studies about the production of wild animals and birds. Indeed, to my mind, there is now convincing evidence that the conversation of wild animals is reasonable to some extent.
To embark upon, There are large amounts of animals and birds in wild world such as in the Amazon rainforest and Africa desert. Therefore, these animals lived during the history until now ,while to protect themselves against other animals. This means there is not negligible to government to spend too much money. As a result, the government can spend its budget on alleviating the poverty and other problems. For example, irrespective of water contamination, the government can make contribution to solve the global warming which threat the life of human kind in recant years. In my view, there are critical needs to satisfy by the government.
On the other hand, it is clear that most animals and birds are on the verge of extinction. So, except the government, we human can firm campaigns to protect animals even if the government can not afford. In other words, it is necessary to attend to these kinds of animal adequately. This means that the government can divert resources to more urgent issues like medicines.
Taking everything into consideration, I would say that protecting wild animals and birds is important not as much as other problems. So it is better the government improve the people’s awareness of the habitat of flora and fauna. Hence, it has adequate money to solve significant problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...imals lived during the history until now ,while to protect themselves against othe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, therefore, while, for example, such as, as a result, in my view, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1295.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07843137255 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81713873729 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576470588235 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.2417979501 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.3333333333 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216482827072 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663886860199 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671748456634 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129504499467 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329720831415 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.