Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Many people believe that some colleges are free to decide their major for pursuing further education and the actual career. In stark contrast, however, others claim that some useful subjects such as science-based subjects or technology-based subjects should be taken into mandatory disciplines. Hold my perspectives, privileges of humankind are to have a chance to learn whatever they want.
As a whole, It is interesting to note that two notions have its own perks. On the side of obligation-free to learn everything that people are fascinating, the most desirable purpose is that they could totally follow their passion. Some people who think that they will learn more effectively if they study an appropriate discipline. Further, having followed their passion, they could possibly create more opportunities for promoting and obtain great perseverance for fixing mistakes in their further education or future career as well. For example, many singers have to face many severe failures, also disagreement from their parents and peers. Nevertheless, standing on the brink of their choice, they bravely continue their careers and perfectly succeed such as JB. Thus, letting people choose the thing they dream is to help them live in their passions and privileges. However, Some passions are unachievable or improper not only individuals, also society. Thus, before choosing subjects or future careers to follow, people need to take it into consideration for avoiding some fallacy or wrong self-decision.
On the other hand, learning some compulsory science-based or technology-based subjects probably plays a paramount role in the guarantee of stable jobs. Some parents show a comparison between science disciplines and art curriculum. They believe that if their children learn those science subjects, they will seek a high-salary job. Considerably, this situation may lead to some misunderstanding circumstances that makes they think it is better if their children study on science and technology subjects. Consequently, this concept might bring an unbalanced scheme of job satisfaction, with a gigantic number of science and technology jobs demand. Following this scenario, it would ultimately cause a lot of underemployment because of redundancy in the number of science and technology employees. Thus, this notion has to be taken into serious observation before promising in the future.
In summary, I strongly inclined to the perception of obligation-free to learn whatever people want to. However, people need to think deliberately in their subjects with realistic and achievable passion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...er, having followed their passion, they could possibly create more opportunities for promoting...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, thus, well, as to, for example, in summary, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2211.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 394.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6116751269 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16236423478 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558375634518 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 678.6 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2726827086 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.285714286 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7619047619 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.67935871743 196% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27036014181 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802569270643 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669891633258 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167199312946 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572408760025 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.