Some people think that government should spend money on faster means of public transport. However, others think money should be spent on other priorities
People have different views about spending money on a budget of its government. While it is argued that a government should invest on speed forms of public transport, I support the idea that the money of government should be used on other importance.
There are two main reasons why a government should not invest into speed transportation. Firstly, it is not suitable for almost road systems, especially in many nations have the narrow road systems and have not private lane for the public transport. Thus, if a government spends money on it, leading to not applied effectively. Secondly, many people have been motion sickness, they are not able to stay in a long time in the types of speed transportation. In addition to, the ticket fees of this vehicles might be high than normal, due to the quality justifies the prices. From that obviously many poor inhabitants might be impossible using it.
On the other hand, other major are more crucial and need to be invested from a government such as education, health, entertainment…and so on. A government should be focusing on them because enhancing knowledge of local people helps obviously increasing GPA of each country. Meanwhile, the country’s comprehensive development and success can be measured by looking at the health, well-being, and happiness of its resident. Hence, the investment of governments on those might be really necessary for nation.
In conclusion, the administration spends money on faster means of public transport that is not applied effectively for all of the road system and all local people. Instead of spending money on this, the government should invest on other important things.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... A government should be focusing on them because enhancing knowledge of local peo...
^^^
Line 4, column 120, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ort that is not applied effectively for all of the road system and all local people. Inste...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, look, really, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1401.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16974169742 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05344254737 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568265682657 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7480729168 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.071428571 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361791733655 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126518966313 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10532331465 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262437686146 0.151304729494 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108339510118 0.056905535591 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.