Some people think that it is good for a country s culture to import foreign movies and TV programmes Others think that it is better to produce these locally Discuss both views and give your opinion

There has been an argument about whether to create entertainment content such as Tv programs and movies in their country is more beneficial or afford it from other nations. Although produce these shows locally has a great number of advantages, I strongly believe that import from the succeed countries is more advisable.
People who support to make entertainment programs state that it will reduce the number of budgets rather than buy it. In fact, searching for essential materials for the progress in their own country does not cost as expensive as importing advanced equips or secret techniques. Furthermore, by creating programs, music and even movies locally which consider as an effective way for governments to allocate money for another aspect including education and technology.
The above-mentioned view seems properly at first, but look deeper sight into it, there will cause a range of problems. One of the primary issues in this opinion is the growth of recreation-producing country's technology. If the facilities are not required enough, how those nations will develop modern entertainment? In this way, it is harmful to poverty countries to improve their recreational content because producing interesting contents cost a wealth of money which adversely impacts not only on other fields of science but also the development of the economy.
Due to many issues that have been outlined above, my personal perspective is, support people to import foreign resources because of the following reasons. The major factor is, it is an apparent fact that producers are more likely to have more time to prepare for the next projects. In other words, by buying developed countries programs, they tend to imitate one or two parts of the original show, as the result, their burden and effort will be shortened by adjusting some suitable contents. Also, international recreations stand a good chance to attract more audiences. We can not deny the variety of shows and movies all over the world with full of diversified format which is produced by well-known authors, directors, and even singers. For this reason, there is an increase in the number of residents who decide to choose international shows, consequently, the income is raising rapidly without a sign of reduction.
Taking everything into consideration, both views are well-grounded, so that it is not easy to come to an accurate conclusion. Nevertheless, I still stand up for boosting import foreign entertainment content to our country which has been justified above.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (2 votes)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, look, nevertheless, so, still, well, in fact, such as, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2126.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 401.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30174563591 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01462532844 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 176.041082164 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605985037406 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 657.9 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4007083573 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.058823529 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5882352941 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222756570411 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0646345521378 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036893066221 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12310930467 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233246765727 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, look, nevertheless, so, still, well, in fact, such as, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2126.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 401.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30174563591 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01462532844 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 176.041082164 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605985037406 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 657.9 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4007083573 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.058823529 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5882352941 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222756570411 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0646345521378 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036893066221 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12310930467 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233246765727 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.