Some people think that tourism does harm to local cultures, and therefore should be banned. Others think otherwise, claiming that local cultures are affected by many factors and therefore tourism should not be banned.
The green industry is one of the most necessary fields that helps the economy of the whole country. It is said that places with rich traditions and a special lifestyle is often benefited a lot. But a group of people believe that the beauty of the particular culture will be lost because of the tourists so it would better to ban them. While others give an opinion that tourism is not the only factor that harms the culture.
Although tourism helps the locals with jobs and income, they can lose their specialists forever. When something sounds mysterious to other people, they will come to see it and when it’s getting too crowded, it will give bad effects on the destination itself as well as the life of the locals. If the area famous for “ruong bac thang” in the North of Viet Nam, it attracts tourists from everywhere. And then, the locals will soon find out that wandering around being the tour guide or selling souvenirs helps them make more money on the far more easier way in comparison to working on the fields. That’s when they accept to give up their tradition and depend on tourism. Because of those reasons, banning tourists coming to town is the best way to protect what we have.
On the opposite to those views above, culture is created and affected by time, the weather, the natural habitat,… and tourism is only a small percentage. Indeed, culture can only be changed if the local allow. I would take all of the Vietnamese culture as an example; Tet holiday is a special occasion when the culture of the Vietnamese people can be showed off the most.
“Fat meat, pickled onions, red parallel sentences.
New Year pole, strings of firecrackers, green Chung cake.”
They are all the very traditional food and things we do in Tet from generation to generation. We do not allow anybody to steal it; it’s a gift of spiritual life and although sometimes it’s getting a bit hard to prepare, we always try to do our best to have time gathering with families and have a peaceful time together however what happens. Knowing that if we gave up Tet, places would be less crowded and there would be more places for tourists and prices would also be more reasonable. It is part of our life for almost thousands of years ago, and it has not been changed much.
From my perspective, banning something is not a good idea. It up to us, whether we accept to make money from it and also make sure it always attractive and important to us or not. A culture is a thing that can not easily be changed but it is very easy to lose. And even sometimes, tourism can help the area grow and become wildly known by people in the world, more reputation means more income and more money.
In total, there are different viewpoints on whether tourism is harmed or not. If it is banned, the locals in rural areas will never have a better standard of life and their outstanding culture cannot be widely spread. Or we will open to tourists to come and visit but not allow them to harm and affect our normal life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-23 | Doan_Nguyen | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 60, Rule ID: IN_NOWADAYS[1]
Message: nowadays is used without 'in'. Use simply: 'nowadays'.
Suggestion: nowadays
...ortable and reliable means of transport in nowadays life. However, cars do harm to the envi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'getting the worst'.
Suggestion: getting the worst
...ars do harm to the environment and it’s getting worst day to day. Many big cites now ban cars...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, moreover, so, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.58139534884 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59903230109 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563953488372 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.6095968104 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.571428571 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208604737664 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596353260765 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555325774065 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121456905828 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485104833741 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 50.2224549098 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 12.4159519038 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.