It is widely argued that giving online lectures is hugely adopted by many universities compared to traditional teaching methods. I personally believe that this alternative has some pros and cons, and the choice of which depends on individuals. This is will first demonstrate some beneficial impacts on the human learning process and make an analysis of how its downsides can affect learners.
On the one hand, some universities show a strong tendency to offer students a wide range of online lectures, and therefore, it gives students a convenient and flexible availability of learning. Due to the enhancement of technologies such as smartphones, or laptops as well as the rapid development of social media like Facebook, Instagram, or Tweeter, studying online is extremely easier compared to the past, regardless of distances. More specifically, learning through the Internet offers learners a great opportunity to explore a huge amount of in-depth knowledge and information by a click of a mouse. For example, in virtue of sudden COVID-19 outbreak, the traditional learning method is replaced by online lecturing which is commonly favored among many students and universities.
On the other hand, this novel way of education seems to experience several difficulties in many aspects. First of all, in terms of facilities, it is reasonably understandable that the lack of cutting-edge technological devices in some remote areas poses a serious threat to the learning process of a student. For instance, the online teaching method is totally out of the question in universities from many developing countries, because of a shortage of budget to purchase or install the necessary equipment. Additionally, cybercrime also a challenging obstacle that all universities have to carefully consider to ensure the quality of an online lecture. Taking Zoom as a prime example, which is one of the world-famous applications for meeting and studying on the Internet is not reliable due to its vulnerable security, and thus, is easily attacked by hackers along with indecent and distorted information.
In conclusion, there is no doubt that the development of technologies greatly promotes one’s education. Having said that, there are still some drawbacks that needed to be taken into consideration in order to create a proper learning environment.
- The table below gives information about the underground railway system in six cities 78
- In many countries a small number of people earn extremely high salaries Some people believe that this is good for the country but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level Discuss both these views and give your own o 84
- In many countries plastic bags are the main source of rubbish causing pollution in oceans and on land therefore they should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- The bar chart below shows different methods of waste disposal in four cities: Toronto, Madrid, Kuala Lumpur, and Amman. 73
- The chart below shows the number of jobs in tourism-related industries in one UK citiy between 1989 and 2009.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 603, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'consider ensuring'.
Suggestion: consider ensuring
...that all universities have to carefully consider to ensure the quality of an online lecture. Takin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o create a proper learning environment.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1985.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4532967033 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20814549238 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587912087912 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 642.6 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.94745224 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.785714286 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0714285714 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188241880692 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609557061267 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374886438618 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110659542309 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414031772709 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.