Topic: Noise pollution is most certainly increasing at an alarming rate in many industrialised countries. What are the problems and in what ways can this problem be overcome?
Recent decades have witnessed the upwards spectrum in the sound pollution, especially in industrialised nations, raising many questions of its negative impacts on human beings. Given that this pattern could be fraught with many pitfalls, official authorities could undertake some initiatives to tackle this problem.
It should be acknowledged that this trend could culminate in some repercussions. First, The constant exposure to irritating sound suggests a causal relationship with stress and tensions in individuals, thereby causing the higher degree of aggression and impatience in their behaviours and attitudes towards others. In addition, the excessive sound disturbance is invariably associated with the disrupted sleeping pattern. The resultant sleeplessness would debilitate their normal body functioning of the impacted individuals such as higher blood pressure and reduced metabolism.
However, governments should find the practical solutions with high efficiency to reverse this pattern. First, the legislation of monetary punishment on individuals or corporations emitting noise exceeding the tolerable threshold should be enacted. This means that people with any intent to cause noise nuisance could think twice especially when it comes to pecuniary considerations. In addition, official authorities should organize campaigns in both public places and on the mainstream media, raising citizens’ awareness of health consequences of noise disturbance. This would significantly minimise the emission of disturbing noise in every household nationwide, acting as a deterrent for the rise in sound pollution.
In conclusion. Although the negative impacts pertaining to noise nuisance could be pronounced, it is not without solutions. By imposing monetary punishment and organizing anti-noise pollution campaigns, the overall proportion of sound pollution would declined remarabkly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 253, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'decline'
Suggestion: decline
...all proportion of sound pollution would declined remarabkly.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1643.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.24714828897 5.12529762239 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19999421706 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.627376425856 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2662299914 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.384615385 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2307692308 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53846153846 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134918008009 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445169469034 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396508054525 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0876701242473 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414258773458 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.97 12.4159519038 153% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.35 8.58950901804 132% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.