Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female study in every subject. Do you agree or disagree.
University admission is a topic that attracts various propositions. One of which suggests that intakes of students in both genders should be equal. I personally disagree with this idea, for several reasons.
Forefront among these is the compatibility of each student to certain fields. This could take root in either the academic background or the innate orientation of the said student. For instance, natural science subjects, which require more logical thinking, such as astronomy and physics, tend to draw in more males. By contrast, their female counterparts may prefer social science, including psychology and literature, as they get to delve deep into human’s feelings. While admission boards should not favor one gender over another, striving to achieve a perfect gender ratio is simply impractical, as candidates also base their university application on their own strengths and weaknesses.
Furthermore, by fixing equal numbers of students in both genders, there comes the risk of unfairly disqualifying students who can meet all of entry requirements. Consequentially, it might result in social resentment among students and hypothetically, insufficient supplies of personnel in some industries. Instead of assessing students based on their gender, universities should compare the students’ demonstrated ability and requirements of the faculty they are applying for. Doing so is more beneficial, as it not only allows students to have a fair chance at receiving specialized education that suits their ability but also ensures a class’s academic standards.
In conclusion, it is my firm conviction that gender should not be a factor in the process of determining whether an applicant deserves his or her spot in a university. Their ability, on the other hand, should be the focal point on which evaluation is made.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts, which require more logical thinking, such as astronomy and physics, tend to d...
^^
Line 7, column 258, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ocal point on which evaluation is made.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58362989324 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19024805516 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665480427046 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8829752971 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.071428571 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07142857143 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100083097785 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0335377050647 0.084324248473 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.029521888907 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0643363512777 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018371361369 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.36 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.