Writing task 2 (an essay)Many people make friends through social sites and chat rooms. Others believe that it is not a good idea to make friends without meeting them face to face. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your own opinion and rel

In the last decades, the majority of folks have found companions by virtue of social media such as face book, twitter and many others in astounding ways. I completely agree that making allies ought to be based on getting together one on one. This essay will first discuss the advantages of making associates without talking to them eye to eye and secondly, the relevant reasons on why remaining friends via cabled systems is seriously detrimental.

On the one hand, generally speaking, one of the key benefits of becoming mates through online networks is that the reluctant public can express thei...

*** The full content of this essay is available to VIP readers

Subscribe as testbig VIP readers and get unlimited access to essays on the top list.

Votes
Average: 9 (3 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ates through online networks is that the reluctant public can express their opini...
^^
Line 3, column 801, Rule ID: AN_ANOTHER[1]
Message: One of these determiners is redundant in this context. Choose only one: 'a citizen' or 'another citizen'.
Suggestion: a citizen; another citizen
...ut body structure and discrimination of an another citizen, which subsequently would lead to a pot...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, well, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2039.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 377.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40848806366 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06105622661 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628647214854 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 648.0 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.0401011221 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.933333333 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1333333333 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212396840452 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604257325809 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411164085202 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122691433255 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458607865077 0.056905535591 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.36 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

and discrimination of an another citizen
and discrimination of another citizen

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 8.0 out of 9
Category: Excellent Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 377 350
No. of Characters: 1992 1500
No. of Different Words: 239 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.406 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.284 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.988 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 155 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 123 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 87 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 58 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.133 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.841 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.6 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.3 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.503 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.041 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5