According to a recent survey, the more time people use the internet, the less time they spend with real human beings.should we worry about the effect this having on on social interaction or should we see the internet as a way of opening up new communication possibilities worldwide.what are you opinion on this matter.
recent surveillance proved that people take advantage of internet to a such great extent that the devote lesser time to communicate with their peers and relatives,this matter would be viewed in two aspects/;whether internet is a new way for communicating with other people or it has influenced efficiency of communication in a negative way.in my idea, internet ia absolutely a positive and benefactor phenomenon which meets the need of socialization in superb way.
In my point of view, In all terms of human living being, there had been a proportion between the technology and the way people used to make communication with each other, to be specific, this two issue always has grown up with each other, as every body knows primitive human used to be social by their simple ways, like making some sounds, therefore it is expect-able how advanced should be the tools we use in contemporary term to communicate with other people. And it is completely suits with complication of our brains and tendencies.
I am thoroughly opposed to the idea that internet has bring about some restriction to our socialization, in contrast, there are lots of cases that can bee mentioned as proofs to the excellent services of internet to build an efficient communication in our hast lives. Bear in mind relatives living abroad or children who are studying overseas, people are communicating with them thorough on-line chat and provide people with convenience and relief. The other example is related with people when feel loneliness and think they need sympathy for some events, in this case internet comes up with various type of social networks to provide people with sustainable friends to get bitter events out of their chest. It obviously assists people with their emotional health and being in touch with others.
In conclusion, not also internet doesn’t hinder people from their routine socialization, but also its serves lots of assistance for all people who are dwelling in the world of new technologies, the quality for communication hasn’t been declined however just changed into modern one which suits with modern trend of life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Recent
recent surveillance proved that people take ad...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...of internet to a such great extent that the devote lesser time to communicate with their p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 163, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , this
...mmunicate with their peers and relatives,this matter would be viewed in two aspects/;...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 323, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative way" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... influenced efficiency of communication in a negative way.in my idea, internet ia absolutely a po...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 381, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...therefore it is expect-able how advanced should be the tools we use in contempora...
^^
Line 9, column 55, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'brought'.
Suggestion: brought
...y opposed to the idea that internet has bring about some restriction to our socializa...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1804.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18390804598 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97194099546 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 43.0 20.2975951904 212% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 140.73823219 49.4020404114 285% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 225.5 106.682146367 211% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 43.5 20.7667163134 209% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 8.875 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252873860242 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103688238416 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549146775109 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148359773768 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474867151631 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.7 13.0946893788 189% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 20.1 11.3001002004 178% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.65 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 31.5 9.78957915832 322% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 19.2 10.1190380762 190% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.