Consumer goods have become the most important of people's lives.Do advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
In a world which is increasingly becoming materialistic, success is measured by the materials and bank balance one has accumulated. In the quest to win the rat race, people have forgotten about human ethics and values which could have long-lasting effects on the society. While these things come with a lot of virtues, the iniquity can not be ignored.
Firstly, consumer products add convenience and comfort to peoples' lives which are a key driver for many to earn an extra bonus or surplus money. For example, people enjoy watching their favorite programs on their expensive, giant television sets. Moreover, it adds to people's social status as they can flaunt their high-priced merchandise and cars to others.
On the other side, people forget their moral and human values as they turned materialistic. They do not give any importance to relations. They alienate from social gatherings and find solace in the company of gadgets. With no one to discuss on matters of work and life, such people get stressed and suffer from psychological problems and end up getting into unethical activities.
Undoubtedly, humanity does not teach to live with machines or spend earnings on physical goods and doing so, will have more problems than solutions. It will be advisable that people improve their social interaction by reducing time with gadgets and having work-life balance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: ADDED_BONUS[1]
Message: This phrase might be redundant. Use simply 'bonus'.
Suggestion: bonus
...ch are a key driver for many to earn an extra bonus or surplus money. For example, people e...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 38, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'living'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'teach' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: living
... Undoubtedly, humanity does not teach to live with machines or spend earnings on phys...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, so, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1156.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 222.0 315.596192385 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20720720721 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75320680576 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.684684684685 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 355.5 506.74238477 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1683416662 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3333333333 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166200072651 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566127633526 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397305609862 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0933716184064 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0187696045694 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.