Every day, millions of tons of food are wasted all over the world. Why do you think this is happening? And how can we solve this problem?
It is true that large amounts of nourishment are misused in the worldwide every day. There could be several reasons for this situation, and I believe that both governments and individuals can take steps to mitigate this issue.
There are several reasons involve for wasting food in the world. Firstly, People have enjoyed social gathering on different occasions. Some people conceive an idea that arranging more food items can be broadens their prestige in the society. Thus, often they arrange any social events without count of guests’ food consumption, which can create a vulnerable situation for wasting foods. A recent survey shows that 40% of foods are wasted from several cultural festivals or family occasions such as weddings, birthday and New Year parties. Evidently, massive amounts of food wastage are formed from there. Another reason is that sometimes parents do over care about their offspring dietary. Hence, they will prepare the food for their children at mealtime are not cognitive with consumption, and these extra foods are treated as wastage. Furthermore, some restaurants offer buffet meal packages where the customers interested to fill their plates with food items rather than eating, and that way lot of food items have wasted from the restaurants.
However, both states and citizens could take several actions to tackle this problem. Firstly, governments could introduce taxes or laws for certain limit of festival food to reduce excessive estimation. Secondly, they could create awareness campaign about wasting of food in social media such as drama or advertisements, and raise parents knowledge about their children nutrition. Finally, some individual restaurants owners could encourage their consumers by poster or distributing leaflet with awareness notes. For instance, a restaurant named ‘food tour’ in Thailand has placard with awareness notes such as ‘do not waste your food’ which could remind customers to ordering food precisely.
In conclusion, both governments and people must play their part for resolving the food waste in our societies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 584, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'placarded'.
Suggestion: placarded
...d 'food tour' in Thailand has placard with awareness notes such as 'do n...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1788.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53560371517 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68622911447 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606811145511 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2463221547 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.176470588 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.17647058824 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186542733972 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639926542497 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379844698808 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117315085179 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392051202055 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.