Far too little has been done to prevent animals and plants from dying out, although people have been aware of this problem for a long time. Why do people do so little about it? Give your suggestion on how to solve this problem.
We, humans, are being selfish since we knew that we are the most advanced creature of this world. We have been working with developments and research to enhance the possibility of improvement in mankind only. Very tiny activities have been carried out to save the plants and animals from decay, despite knowing about this condition. In this essay, the reasons for not caring about animals and plants, and the possible solution to this problem will be discussed in the following paragraphs in detail.
Firstly, Humans are self-centred, we care about our self on this planet more than anything. We have been working with various research projects to improve the life possibilities of mankind on earth. The animals and plants cannot express their views and emotions immediately and humans working in this competitive world have no time to understand the mouthless creatures. For an example, the 90 per cent of wild plant infections is still unknown because the wild plants have very little importance to the city human individuals and it takes time to people to understand the problems of these wild plants.
Secondly, we humans need to think on broader terms like for the future world. Furthermore, we need to be more social than present to care about our ecosystem. A spread of knowledge is must to promote the healthy environment for the sake of future. Improvements in Sanctuary, wild forests, and parks to support the growth and developments in animals and plants is a necessity.
In conclusion, we humans being a top hierarchy, we should take a stand and spread knowledge for the care of the environment to have a better future for all the creature of this world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 185, Rule ID: MUST_HAVE_TO[1]
Message: After 'must', the verb is used without 'to'. Probably, you should use 'must' or 'have to' here.
Suggestion: must; have to
...our ecosystem. A spread of knowledge is must to promote the healthy environment for the...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, still, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1398.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99285714286 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72887058943 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3956961701 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.538461538 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76923076923 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230907814378 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840105612534 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618175466038 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140770906056 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0746622590419 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.