The increased use of text messaging using mobile phones is largely to blame for the falling standards in written English, particularly among young people, many of whom are unable to construct grammatically correct sentences.To what extent do you agree or

Essay topics: The increased use of text messaging using mobile phones is largely to blame for the falling standards in written English, particularly among young people, many of whom are unable to construct grammatically correct sentences.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Hussein1987's picture

Actually, the usage of mobile's texts become so popular between matures, this merit is very impotant to be available in the phones. As it helps so many people by sending messages to whomever thy want from friends, notable that it is very fast and cheaper. However, there enormous number of youngs misuse the proper methods by sending the letters from phone to phone. Knowing that no one should be blamed for errors of grammar which it happens while sending the messages, therefore, i disagree that the increased use of written text in the cell phone is the one which need to be blamed but, matures who must be involved for not following the correct technique of writing such a text message. I will explain here the reasons.

Alhough, there are prportion of matures prefer to send a text with grammar faults. In addition, mobiles have been designed with the highest technologies terms, as well as there are a several of modernized icons have been added to the mobile. As a result, people who are like to send a message inproper way. For example Apple company has created iphone with latest programms, furthermore, all the updated charaters are available in the phone. If someone has disability for composing the forms of words and verbs, Simply you can go to setting and activate prediction text, hence it can be automatically justified properly. In that light, it depends on people in how to produce words into senteces and making it understable. Sometimes, the wrong of sent text messages could lead to a passive consequences of misunderstanding each other.

To sum up, cellphones have been developed with the highest technology ever, so it depends on the persons how they can send letters.

Votes: 
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
More essays by this user:

Pages

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 482, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... while sending the messages, therefore, i disagree that the increased use of writ...
^
Line 6, column 184, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'severals'?
Suggestion: severals
...hnologies terms, as well as there are a several of modernized icons have been added to ...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 790, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'consequence'?
Suggestion: consequence
...t text messages could lead to a passive consequences of misunderstanding each other. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ped with the highest technology ever, so it depends on the persons how they can s...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, as a result, as well as, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1425.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94791666667 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64687889446 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597222222222 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.9776081986 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.615384615 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4615384615 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160204773351 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0447306057768 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422012980886 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0883843929038 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0723144312927 0.056905535591 127% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Pages