Under the background that the metropolitans and even the small cities suffers more and more serious problems of congestion and pollution, some people argue that the price of petrol should be increased. While I partly agree this can make a difference, there are other measures we can do to tackle these problems.
The rising cost of oil gas influences consumers' behaviors in many ways. First of all, considering the famous economic theory, namely, demand-needs theory, price is an effective factor to change the relation between demand and needs of products. The needs of oil will slump with the higher price. As a result, people are less likely to drive their cars. However, servals needs are still difficult to adjust, which will lead to increase a small segment of citizen's burden.
Luckily, governments and individuals have various other solutions to choose. Governments have the ability to allocate more of their budgets on developing public transportation, such as buses, electric trains, metros and expresses, which are more effective and environmentally friendly. Secondly, better designs and construction of roads and urban planning benefit a lot by using available transportation facilities better. For instance, when housing regions are scattered in the suburb and jobs are concentrated in CBD, commuting could invoke too much pressure on transportation during rush hours. Finally, governments could hold some activities to encourage individuals to improve their awareness about energy crisis on our planet . As individuals, we are supposed to change our behaviors to reduce the pollution and protect the environment.
After having discussed the most pertinent points of this issue, I feel the only logical conclusion is that the higher gas cost could deal with the problems in some degree and both governments and individuals are able to apply other potent effective solutions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 732, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...reness about energy crisis on our planet . As individuals, we are supposed to chan...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, while, for instance, i feel, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45238095238 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92990798761 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632653061224 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.1788151754 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101587991504 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0300645991794 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378978656351 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0622607019227 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493762950802 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.