It is generally accepted that families are not as close as they used to be.
Give some reasons why this change has happened and suggest how families could be
Brought closer together.
Include any relevant examples from your experience.
Nowadays bonding between family members is shrinking owing to fast pace life. There are a number of reasons for this trend. However, it can be changed by taking proper actions.
Firstly, both men and women are breadwinners in the majority of families in the present era, forming a void between them and their siblings. Moreover, this tendency converted joint families to nuclear ones, detaching kids from their cousins and grandparents. Secondly, everyone in the highly competitive world is aiming to cut the mustard, eventually trapped in never ending rat race to achieve materialistic targets. Finally, the technology has immensely impacted daily lives of society where many are seen shooting the breeze on social media or spending free time surfing online shopping websites. Thus, less or not time with loved ones.
While these problems can be eschewed with proper and sustainable methods to eradicate hostile environment from families. To begin with, either one of the partner may opt workplace with flexible timings to have quality time with relatives. In addition, the government can setup industries , factories and education institutions in rural areas, so that plenty of jobs and learning opportunities are available for people to grow in their career as well as live together in joint families. Finally, old-fashioned talks after day’s work while having the dinner may bring back the charm of love in the members.
In conclusion, people of the clan should live together because they need each other if they face any problem. The responsibility of reversing this trend resides mainly with the individual, however the regime’s contribution support cannot be ignored.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 270, Rule ID: CAN_SETUP[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can set up'?
Suggestion: can set up
...relatives. In addition, the government can setup industries , factories and education in...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 290, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ion, the government can setup industries , factories and education institutions in...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42803030303 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79896232616 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.712121212121 0.561755894193 127% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9931968504 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.357142857 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8571428571 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112937177274 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0403937201285 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384246365397 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0769601586234 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415858836319 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.