It has been proved that smoking kills. In some countries it has been made illegal for people to smoke in all public places except in certain areas. All countries should make these rules. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is well known fact that smoking is dangerous for health. Smoking in public places is not allowed in some countries except some specially designed smoking areas. It is argued by many that this rule should applied to all the countries. This essay will explain why I completely agree with the proposition.
The primary reason why smoking should be controlled in public regions is because smoke is more dangerous and harmful for passive smoker. People, in public, are more effected by the smoke of tobacco as compared to person who is taking this. For example, there is research suggests that smoke that comes after burning of tobacco is comparatively fifty percent more harmful for the passive smokers. Therefore, the idea that smoking should not be banned is ill-informed and is dangerous in itself and could potentially lead to more worse outcome for any society.
In addition, smoking is responsible for the generation of many diseases such as cancer and banning this in public can demotivate active smokers to consume this less. Banning this will help in ensuring the better mental and physical level of people of any society. For example, a professor at university of London reveals that cancer cases has been dropped significantly in the Punjab region of India after the ban of tobacco by the government. Therefore, control on the diseases linked with the consumption of tobacco can be possible through banning it in public.
Therefore, people who are against the stopping of tobacco consumption in public have flawed understanding and they do not have exact understanding of the problems linked with its consumption. This essay has discussed how smoke ban can help in improving the medical condition of both active and passive smoker. In my opinion, I completely agree that there should be ban on smoking in public across the world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 524, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'worse' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: worse
...in itself and could potentially lead to more worse outcome for any society. In addition...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 366, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'banned'?
Suggestion: banned
...I completely agree that there should be ban on smoking in public across the world.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, well, for example, in addition, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08223684211 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68428913391 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1411952432 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86666666667 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305239482324 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109830787854 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700788290166 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201341737693 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0967021262694 0.056905535591 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.