In many countries the tradition of families having meals together is disappearing. Why is this happen? What will be the effects of it to the family and to the society?
Decades ago families were having meals together was a common practise. At present, the situation is changed due to various factors such as: enormous times spend on the internet or mobile applications; people follow different working hours and parents are fostering their children on the importance of it. Because of this trend both family and society are getting affects disastrously. In the following passage, the factors influencing this change as well as the negative impacts will be explained briefly.
Nowadays, many youngsters spend huge time in browsing internet and actively involving in social media websites. Because of this, they tend to have meals at their convenient time. For instance, my neighbour’s family have meals at different time due to their own leisure activities. Hence, the bonding between the family members was slowly disappeared. In addition, people work in the different time zone adds to this cause too. More over, parents are not educating their kids on the traditional value by having meals together. Therefore, above are the various reasons which catalyse to this change.
There are many negative consequences because of this trend as well. Primarily the bonding between the family members has lost. For example, my friend spent less time to interact with his parents, because of this, when he faces tough situations, he was provoked to commit suicide, such situations can be avoided by having healthy relation with family members. Further more, this trend will also have an impact on the society, where the harmony between the local people will be affected due to less interaction. Hence, the above factors are becoming big threat to the nation.
To conclude, it is the responsibility of parents to groom their youngsters on the importance of having meals together, which will create a good relationship among family members and this will create better human beings for the society.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, hence, if, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1618.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27035830619 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68284895027 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5667752443 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.8188074171 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1764705882 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0588235294 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23529411765 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312580211977 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103184144489 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643162988924 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204047011213 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00645884179157 0.056905535591 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.