Some of the countries in the world are very rich in terms their economic power, living standards and life of the people of these countries are very high. But it is not the case of many other countries, especially developing and under developed countries. A considerable percentage of people of these countries are living under below average standards. Even though they are getting monitory help from both rich nations and NGO's, but the problem of poverty still exisist enthuse part of the world. Some people think that rich countries give other type of help to solve this problem instead of offering money. I completely agree with this opinion.
First of all, poverty is a sign of a regimes poor economic and social conditions. In such countries we can not expect every thing works perfectly when we give out money to help the poor. Like every system, the government organisations of such countries are probably corrupted and they use the the help to pocket them selfs. Secondly, in these type of nations they definitely lacks the basic necessities and resources, money can not buy all these things. what the point of giving money if the proper resources like clean water and electricity are not available in the country. Lastly, the effect of financial aids does not last long, as soon they are become empty handed they again approach to these aids for additional monitory help. No country can survive only depending up on others help.
In order to solve the poverty issue, the rich should change their helping strategy. Rather than giving financial aids they should focus on helping these poor countries to stand alone by themselves by providing adequate help in finding adequate resources. Moreover, developed countries should try to invest more on these under developed countries economies especially in sectors like education and infrastructure development. Furthermore, they should also try to introduce innovative technological equipments that are currently in use in various sectors like farming. This should help them to achieve a growing economy.
In conclusion, monitory help alone can not solve the issue of poverty, there are things rich countries and NGO's should fcous when they offer help to poor countries otherwise all their help may end up in vein.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
Some of the countries in the world are very rich in...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 36, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a regime' or simply 'regimes'?
Suggestion: a regime; regimes
.... First of all, poverty is a sign of a regimes poor economic and social conditions. In...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: CONFUSION_OF_OUR_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'our'?
Suggestion: our
...very thing works perfectly when we give out money to help the poor. Like every syst...
^^^
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ies are probably corrupted and they use the the help to pocket them selfs. Secondly, in...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ies are probably corrupted and they use the the help to pocket them selfs. Secondly, in...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 376, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'lack'
Suggestion: lack
...n these type of nations they definitely lacks the basic necessities and resources, mo...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 386, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...pe of nations they definitely lacks the basic necessities and resources, money can not buy all th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 455, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: What
...es, money can not buy all these things. what the point of giving money if the proper...
^^^^
Line 7, column 201, Rule ID: IN_VEIN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'in vain' (=unsuccessfully)?
Suggestion: in vain
...ies otherwise all their help may end up in vein.
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 210, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wise all their help may end up in vein.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, lastly, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, thus, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1904.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11827956989 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61059015278 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524193548387 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7183126244 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.210526316 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5789473684 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.31578947368 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.01903807615 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404935235411 0.244688304435 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127150469144 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0989755957346 0.0667982634062 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266262803997 0.151304729494 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028804846405 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.