Nowadays, food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Food is essential thing to survive all living species, till last century it was quite difficult to prepare the food, but as technology has been outpacing, scientists has invented LPG gas, electric induction heat plates, precooked foods, which made the food preparation process much easy. I per my view these change does not upgrade our life, but it has more negative effects . In this essay I will discuss the points how these change is not enhancing our living style.

Firstly, Number of kitchen applications are available in the market which simplified the cooking process , as a result of this making eatable food is quite simple task. For an example, Prepared food and kitchen appliances like microwave oven, electric induction plates, LPG stoves and solar cookers are also making the overall method to prepare the food simple. As a result of these making food is much easier then compared to past.

On the other side, as the way to prepare the food change it has negative effect on our life and living habits. Like, A research conducted by one of the US government body stated that fast food is unhealthy for human, because most of the time people prefer non-seasonal food which not only harm our immune system also it could be the main reason for laziness. Moreover these easy cooked food are strongly prohibited by doctors and food exports. So, considering all the scenarios fast cooking method is hampering our physical health.

In the conclusion, As making food has become menial process, but it have more negative impact on our live, even though it not recommended by expertise so I am not in the favor to the statement that this change has making live upgraded.

Votes
Average: 9.3 (3 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 375, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...r life, but it has more negative effects . In this essay I will discuss the points...
^^
Line 4, column 105, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ket which simplified the cooking process , as a result of this making eatable food...
^^
Line 4, column 363, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rall method to prepare the food simple. As a result of these making food is much e...
^^
Line 4, column 404, Rule ID: COMPARISONS_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'easier than'?
Suggestion: easier than
...s a result of these making food is much easier then compared to past. On the other side,...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 411, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ult of these making food is much easier then compared to past. On the other side,...
^^^^
Line 6, column 360, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
... could be the main reason for laziness. Moreover these easy cooked food are strongly pro...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 69, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
... food has become menial process, but it have more negative impact on our live, even ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, then, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90175438596 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46832081703 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585964912281 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.5493347105 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9090909091 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198597058713 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816809007208 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456940422089 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128153916473 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234230806463 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.