Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what has technology affected the types of relationships people make?Has this become a postive or negative development?

Essay topics:

Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.
In what has technology affected the types of relationships people make?
Has this become a postive or negative development?

In this modern era, there is an ongoing deliberation among people on the usage of technology in communication. While some people argue that the disadvantages overweigh the advantages on the technological impact on communicational sector. On my point of view, I strongly disagree with this statement and in this essay, I shall discuss factors in strengthening my argument.

First and foremost, in past years people have used letters and telegrams for communication. In modern market context people use web applications such as viber, imo, whats app and messenger for their communication together with e-mails and and internal memos. For example, most of the companies use internal memos in order to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of communication. At the same time, organizations use sophisticated technology in communication with the external stakeholders such as customers and suppliers. In addition, those who live far away from their family members can keep their relationship via communicational tools such as mobile phones and internet technology.

On the other hand, improved communicational channels enable people to keep relationship at much cheaper cost with less time period of time. For instance, some of the employees are allowed to work from home by the use of remote technology. This initiative save cost and time on travelling and the employer can cut down their cost on accomadation by creating a virtual office at the cyber space. Moreover, today’s communicational tools are more reliable than earlier methods because there is a less possibility in missing the message by the reciever unless there is a technological issue.

In conclusion, it is recommended to promote communicate through modern technological platform because of its positive impacts on the society, such as confidentiality, availability, security and quality. It is also believed that, that there should be sufficient rules and regulations in minimizing the negative impacts on the society such as addiction on social media. In nutshell, government can invest on improving infrastructure on communication because modern communicational tools leads to sustainable development of a particular country.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e usage of technology in communication. While some people argue that the disadvantage...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...se web applications such as viber, imo, whats app and messenger for their communicati...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...eir communication together with e-mails and and internal memos. For example, most of th...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...hip at much cheaper cost with less time period of time. For instance, some of the employees ar...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 155, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...less time period of time. For instance, some of the employees are allowed to work from home...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, moreover, so, then, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1878.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63963963964 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.46240125588 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576576576577 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9851354365 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.2 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.06666666667 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181312764134 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061047497176 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373396113335 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111147730437 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359252599133 0.056905535591 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.