Smacking children is the best form of discipline. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Smacking children have become increasingly popular among certain demographics of society. These people claim that giving corporal punishment is the superlative way of making the young ones disciplined. I entirely disagree with this proposition because it has an adverse effect on child psychology.
It is fairly easy to comprehend why some individuals favour this unacceptable behaviour. This is mainly because they believe it would breed fear in younger people and assist them to become well-behaved individuals. If parents give some physical punishment to their offspring for doing something wrong, he will definitely hesitate to repeat the same thing in the future; consequently, he will become a disciplined person. For example, slapping a child when he mistreated his siblings means he will obviously be not misbehaving with other youngsters. In short, from these people’s perspectives, smacking youngsters are necessary in order to avoid them from engaging in anti-social acts.
However, this idea does not seem judicious to me as it could cast a damaging effect on child psychology in the long run. Adolescent, who is subjected to corporal punishment all the times, is more likely to turn into rebellious adult. As they see their guardians hitting them or slapping them on minor mistakes, they become more aggressive and short-tempered. Being exposed to incessant physical violence weakens their psychology; therefore, they are unable to differentiate between acceptable and unacceptable behaviour. I believe instead of practising this cruel act, it’s better to deal child’s behavioural issues in polite way. Examples set of parents could largely help young minds to become accountable as they tend to imitate by observing from the environment.
Conclusively, smacking is really a barbaric practice and parents who employ this act should be penalised. It’s the parents' responsibility to make wholesome atmosphere at home where child himself can learn discipline.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 601, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...om these people’s perspectives, smacking youngsters are necessary in order to avo...
^^
Line 3, column 615, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...etter to deal child’s behavioural issues in polite way. Examples set of parents c...
^^
Line 4, column 115, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'parents'' or 'parent's'?
Suggestion: parents'; parent's
... this act should be penalised. It’s the parents responsibility to make wholesome atmosp...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 205, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to discipline'
Suggestion: to discipline
...e at home where child himself can learn discipline.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, really, so, therefore, well, for example, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60333333333 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10961769712 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653333333333 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.97313164 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.0625 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8125 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0576707858444 0.244688304435 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0185449699284 0.084324248473 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0308001890468 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0408152609227 0.151304729494 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316581198626 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.