Some countries encourage teenagers to have part-time job and see it as a good thing, while others disagree. Give your opinion and explain both views.

It has been observed for the past couple of years that students are more engaged in multiple tasks along with their study. Few countries motivate juvenile to do a part-time job because they see a positive prospect in it, however, other believe in the opposite.
As per my understand an opinion I stand with the first view, as a part-time job has plus points which I will discuss in this essay.

Firstly, Considering the view of people who oppose the part-time job concept. There could be multiple reasons for their mindset, like getting involved in a part-job could mislead or derailed the juveniles to achieve their educational goal, also there are chances that to earn the money they would take any illegal step.Therefore, one can argue that teenager is less mature so they should concentrate on their study instead of part-time job.

On the other side, There are few positive points connected with part-time job. By doing this activity youngster can learn the time management skills which will make them to plan their activities within the given time frame. Also, they can become financially independent and spend their earned money as per their need or interest. For an instance, Most of the developed countries allow students to work and a part-time employee so that they can earn money as well as get some skills.
Thus, Part-time job for teenagers is a healty option for them.

In conclusion, As there are few negative aspects are associated with part-time job nevertheless it is more profiltable thing, I believe that every country should support this.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 320, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
... money they would take any illegal step.Therefore, one can argue that teenager is less ma...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1310.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5999287283 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595419847328 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.5785392494 49.4020404114 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.090909091 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8181818182 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.81818181818 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228719713379 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104338579497 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609505351144 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134860763146 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0119933448889 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.