In some countries that have already achieved affluence, any additional economic wealth would not make people happier.To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, economic conditions have been developed in all countries in the world. However, developing countries have better achievement in increasing their happiness indicator rather than developed countries. I agree with this statement, and I will try to elaborate reasons for this phenomenon in this essay.
Competition is the first reason why people in developed countries are no happy that they were. Due to the economic growth, companies put themself in competition. This condition creates new rules for workers. Employees are forced to work harder than before to avoid being beaten by other companies regarding technology, quality and quantity. Take mobile phone companies as an example. They compete to develop new technology to attract consumers. On the other hand, people in developing countries are focused more on building their businesses. Instead of competing with each other, many of the companies are categorized as small to medium companies.
Moreover, people of developed countries already have wealth to enjoy a better standard of living. Increased wealth will not add any happiness to their day-to-day life. On the other hand, people of developing countries can enjoy a better standard of living due to economic growth, which makes them happier because it is like that when you are already a billionaire. A few billion in your wealth don't make you happy or sad, but you earn only a few hundred bucks. Suddenly your earnings increased up to millions then definitely people will feel satisfied with this development.
Another reason is the time spent. When there are many competitions among companies, there is more work to do for the workers. This will lead to more time spent in the workplace rather than spending time in their private life. Unconsciously, these companies increase the stress level of their workers, which means people in developed countries are no happy than before. In the opposite situation, people in developing countries become more satisfied because they can earn more money for their family than they were, even though they have to spend more time in the workplaces. It decreases their stress level.
From the reasons I mentioned above, it is clear that economic growth can bring wealth to both countries, which is the good side. Still, the work pressure and the time spent are not worth it for some people, especially in developed countries, which are the dark sides of economic growth. It also shows that wealth is not the main guarantee for people to gain happiness in life; there is quality time with friends and families too.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-27 | mikeli2021 | 84 | view |
| 2021-03-27 | mikeli2021 | 73 | view |
- The spread of multinational companies and increasing globalization and have positive effects on everyone Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience 78
- In some countries that have already achieved affluence any additional economic wealth would not make people happier To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that it is necessary to travel abroad to learn about other countries but other people think that it is not necessary to travel abroad because all the information can be seen at TV and the Internet Discuss both views and give your own opi 67
- In some countries that have already achieved affluence any additional economic wealth would not make people happier To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 394, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...llionaire. A few billion in your wealth dont make you happy or sad, but you earn onl...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, still, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2164.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 420.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15238095238 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64958816806 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495238095238 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 668.7 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 16.0721442886 156% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.3391294457 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.56 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198292259163 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555813816586 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566185291134 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116436460446 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706709366722 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.