It is a highly controversial issue in recent days to engage with whether genetically ability contribute to becoming a successful athlete, musician or actor or it can be acquired through the contemporary and conventional methods of learning. In my opinion, I am going to shed some light on both points of view and extend my partially support to the latter view.
To elaborate further, one side of the argument states that inherent skills are not prerequisites to become a successful individual. The main reason behind to reckon that professionals like a celebrity like an actor, director, writer, dancer, superstar, sportsman have got remarkable achievement in early age. One ideal example of this is the famous actor Richard Johnson effortlessly learned the skill of the to present the fiction and fiction genre since his childhood. Hence, it is easy to identify why this argument has bit support.
To fortify further, on the flip side of the debate assert that it is not essential that a victorious person must have inherent talent. It is often argued that natural skill and hard work are not mutually exclusive. It is possible to acquire skill and knowledge under the appropriate training and excellent preparation. This dimension of excellence required diligence, hard-work, persistent efforts. One Good instance of the Jullie crisly have not pre-knowledge about her profession. Therefore, it does not refute that the phenomenon successful people are not born, they not made.
To conclude, aforesaid paragraph the clear and competent view that express both states have their merits. On balance, however, I assert that both innate skill and training are essential for individual growth and development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 258, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al methods of learning. In my opinion, I am going to shed some light on both poin...
^^
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ike a celebrity like an actor, director, writer, dancer, superstar, sportsman hav...
^^
Line 3, column 525, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'bitten'.
Suggestion: bitten
... easy to identify why this argument has bit support. To fortify further, on the ...
^^^
Line 5, column 424, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...istent efforts. One Good instance of the Jullie crisly have not pre-knowledge abo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, so, therefore, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33210332103 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94393262275 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619926199262 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1397489888 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.214285714 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78571428571 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131816995072 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0410955817512 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433196139242 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0769461585386 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498889890676 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.