Some people think that the effective way to reduce pollution is to tax the companies which cause it. Others think that there are better ways to achieve this. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Air pollution and global warming are the end result of enormous amount of fossil fuel burned in the industries. To reduce the pollution level and clear the air few people ponder that, high tax penalty should be imposed to the companies, so that they control the emission of toxic chemicals, however this step seems to be unpractical as we have option of clear energy.
As per my opinion is strongly advocate that putting high tax does not solve the issue, companies needs to adopt latest technology to control the pollution. In this essay I will discuss both the view and explain that using better process and technique could be the best solution of the pollution.

Firstly, It is fact that fear of tax or high penalty, leads companies to follow the rules and regulations. However, It has been observed in the past companies sucessed to cheat the government by giving false report on their pollution level, even though they cause tremendous amount of pollution. For an instance, In 2015 one of the world's leading automobile company was found guilty for inserting a electronic device in their cars so that they can mislead the exact amount of emission but authorities tracked this and because of this company call back all their sold out cars back. Therefor, fear of tax can lead companies towards corruption.

On the other side, Now we have advanced technology which can contribute companies to low the pollution and these methods are far effective. For an example, main cause of pollution is burn the fossil fuels to generate the energy, but using solar energy, wind turbines and hydro electric options can be use to produce energy. These methods are Eco-friendly and zero carbon emission process, furthermore, electric battery operated automobiles vehicles can be replaced with conventional fossil fuel based models. Thus, By using clean energy we can minimize the pollution level and these methods are less expensive.

To conclude, As I discussed both the points, we could not solve the pollution problem by increasing the tax amount, companies should move towards clean energy and environment saver process.

Votes
Average: 7.2 (4 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 31, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'advocated'.
Suggestion: advocated
... energy. As per my opinion is strongly advocate that putting high tax does not solve th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 107, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'adopt the latest'.
Suggestion: adopt the latest
...not solve the issue, companies needs to adopt latest technology to control the pollution. In...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 398, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... company was found guilty for inserting a electronic device in their cars so that...
^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...can lead companies towards corruption. On the other side, Now we have advanced ...
^^^
Line 6, column 302, Rule ID: BE_USE_TO_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...bines and hydro electric options can be use to produce energy. These methods are Ec...
^^^
Line 6, column 302, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...bines and hydro electric options can be use to produce energy. These methods are Ec...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, so, thus

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1773.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08022922636 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59459345045 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567335243553 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.1713529512 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.384615385 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8461538462 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92307692308 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18117952791 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669227296406 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366508404265 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103263020803 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277110708437 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.